Lyndon B. Johnson: A Pattern for Peace in Southeast
Asia
The Johns Hopkins Speech (April 26, 1965)
. . . Tonight Americans and Asians are dying for a world where each
people may choose its own path to change.
This is the principle for which our ancestors fought in the valleys
of Pennsylvania. It is the principle for which our sons fight in the jungles
of Vietnam.
Vietnam is far from this quiet campus. We have no territory there,
nor do we seek any. The war is dirty and brutal and difficult and some
400 young men, born into an America bursting with opportunity and promise,
have ended their lives on Vietnam's steaming soil.
Why must we take this painful road?
Why must this nation hazard its ease, its interest, and its power for
the sake of a people so far away?
We fight because we must fight if we are to live in a world where every
country can shape its own destiny. And only in such a world will our own
freedom be finally secure.
This kind of a world will never be built by bombs or bullets. Yet the
infirmities of man are such that force must often precede reason, and the
waste of war, the works of peace.
We wish this were not so. But we must deal with the world as it is,
if it is ever to be as we wish.
The world as it is in Asia is not a serene or peaceful place. The first
reality ist hat North Vietnam has attacked the independent nation of South
Vietnam Its object is total conquest
Of course, some of the people of South Vietnam are participating in
this attack on their own government. But trained men and supplies, orders
and arms, flow in a constant stream from North to South.
This support is the heartbeat of the war.
And it is a war of unparalleled brutality. Simple farmers are the targets
of assassination and kidnapping. Women and children are strangled in the
night because their men are loyal to their Government. Small and helpless
villages are ravaged by sneak attacks. Large-scale raids are conducted
on towns, and terror strikes in the heart of cities.
The confused nature of this conflict cannot mask the fact that it is
the new face of an old enemy. It is an attack by one country upon another.
And the object of that attack is a friend to which we are pledged.
Over this war, and all Asia, is another reality: the deepening shadow
of Communist China. The rulers in Hanoi are urged on by Peking. This is
a regime which has destroyed freedom in Tibet, attacked India, and been
condemned by the United Nations for aggression in Korea. It is a nation
which is helping the forces of violence in almost every continent. The
contest in Vietnam is part of a wider pattern of aggressive purpose.
Why are these realities our concern? Why are we in South Vietnam? We
are there because we have a promise to keep. Since 1954 every American
President has offered support to the people of South Vietnam. We have helped
to build, and we have helped to defend. Thus, over many years, we have made
a national pledge to help South Vietnam defend its independence. And I
intend to keep our promise.
To dishonor that pledge, to abandon this small and brave nation to
its enemy, and to the terror that must follow, would be an unforgivable
wrong.
We are also there to strengthen world order. Around the globe, from
Berlin to Thailand, are people whose well-being rests, in part, on the belief
that they can count on us if they are attacked. To leave Vietnam
to its fate would shake the confidence of all these people in the
value of American commitment, the value of America's word. The result would
be increased unrest and instability, and even wider war.
We are also there because there are great stakes in the balance. Let
no one think for a moment that retreat from Vietnam would bring an end
to conflict. The battle would be renewed in one country and then another.
The central lesson of our time is that the appetite of aggression is never
satisfied. To withdraw from one battlefield means only to prepare for the
next. We must say in Southeast Asia, as we did in Europe, in the words
of the Bible: "Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further."
There are those who say that all our effort there will be futile, that
China's power is such it is bound to dominate all Southeast Asia. But there
is no end to that argument until all the nations of Asia are swallowed
up.
There are those who wonder why we have a responsibility there. We have
it for the same reason we have a responsibility for the defense of freedom
in Europe. World War II was fought in both Europe and Asia, and when it
ended we found ourselves with continued responsibility for the defense
of freedom.
Our objective is the independence of South Vietnam, and its freedom
from attack. We want nothing for ourselves, only that the people of South
Vietnam be allowed to guide their own country in their own way.
We will do everything necessary to reach that objective. And we will
do only what is absolutely necessary.
In recent months, attacks on South Vietnam were stepped up. Thus it
became necessary to increase our response and to make attacks by air. This
is not a change of purpose. It is a change in what we believe that
purpose.
We do this in order to slow down aggression.
We do this to increase the confidence of the brave people of South
Vietnam who have bravely borne this brutal battle for so many years and
with so many casualties.
And we do this to convince the leaders of North Vietnam, and all who
seek to share their conquest, of a very simple fact:
We will not be defeated.
We will not grow tired.
We will not withdraw, either openly or under the cloak of a meaningless
agreement.
We know that air attacks alone will not accomplish all these purposes.
But it is our best and prayerful judgment that they are a necessary part
of the surest road to peace.
We hope that peace will come swiftly. But that is in the hands of others
besides ourselves. And we must be prepared for a long, continued conflict.
It will require patience as well as bravery, the will to endure as well
as the will to resist.
I wish it were possible to convince others with words of what we now
find it necessary to say with guns and planes: Armed hostility is futile.
Our resources are equal to any challenge because we fight for values and
we fight for principles, rather than territory or colonies. Our
patience and determination are unending.
Once this is clear, then it should also be clear that the only path
for reasonable men is the path of peaceful settlement.
Such peace demands an independent South Vietnam securely guaranteed
and able to shape its own relationships to all others, free from outside
interference, tied to no alliance, a military base for no other country.
These are the essentials of any final settlement.
We will never he second in the search for such a peaceful
settlement in Vietnam.
There may he many ways to this kind of peace: in discussion or
negotiation with the governments concerned; in large groups or in
small ones; on the reaffrmation of old agreements or their strengthening
with new ones.
We have stated this position over and over again fifty
times and more, to friend and foe alike. And we remain ready with this
purpose, for unconditional discussions
And until that bright and necessary day of peace we will try to keep
conflict from spreading. We have no desire to see thousands die in battle,
Asians or Americans. We have no desire to devastate that which the people
of North Vietnam have built with toil and sacrifice. We will use our power
with restraint and with all the wisdom we can command. But we will use it.
This war, like most wars, is filled with terrible irony. For what do
the people of North Vietnam want? They want what their neighbors also desire:
food for their hunger, health for their bodies and a chance to ream, progress
for their country, and an end to the bondage of material misery. And they
would find all these things far more readily in peaceful association with
others than in the endless course of battle.
These countries of Southeast Asia are homes for millions of impoverished
people. Each day these people rise at dawn and struggle until the night
to wrest existence from the soil. They are often wracked by disease, plagued
by hunger, and death comes at the early age of 40.
Stability and peace do not come easily in such a land. Neither independence
nor human dignity will ever be won by arms alone. It also requires the
works of peace.
The American people have helped generously in times past in these works.
Now there must be a much more massive effort to improve the life of
man in the conflict-torn corner of our world.
The first step is for the countries of Southeast Asia to associate
themselves in a greatly expanded cooperative effort for development. We
would hope that North Vietnam will take its place in the common effort
just as soon as peaceful cooperation is possible.
The United Nations is already actively engaged in development in this
area, and as far back as 1961 I conferred with our authorities in Vietnam
in connection with their work there.
I would hope that the Secretary-General of the United Nations could
use the prestige of his great office, and his deep knowledge of Asia, to
initiate, as soon as possible, with the countries of the area, a plan for
cooperation in increased development.
For our part I will ask the Congress to join in a billion-dollar American
investment in this effort as soon as it is under way.
And I hope all other industrialized countries, including the Soviet
Union, will join in this effort to replace despair with hope, and terror
with progress.
The task is nothing less than to enrich the hopes and existence of
more than a hundred million people. And there is much to be done.
The vast Mekong River can provide food and water and power on a scale
to dwarf even our own TVA.
The wonders of modern medicine can be spread through villages where
thousands die every year from lack of care. Schools can be established
to train people in the skills that are needed to manage the process of
development.
And these objectives, and more, are within the reach of a cooperative
and determined effort.
I also intend to expand and speed up a program to make available our
farm surplus to assist in feeding and clothing the needy in Asia We should
not allow people to go hungry and wear rags while our own warehouses overflow
with an abundance of wheat and corn, rice and cotton.
I will very shortly name a special team of patriotic and distinguished
Americans
to inaugurate our participation in these programs. This team will beheaded
by Mr. Eugene Black, the very able former president of the World Bank.
In areas still ripped by conflict, of course, development will not
be easy. Peace will be necessary for final success. But we cannot
wait for peace to begin the job.
This will be a disorderly planet for a long time. In Asia, as elsewhere,
the forces of the modern world are shaking old ways and uprooting ancient
civilizations. There will be turbulence and struggle and even violence.
Great social change, as we see in our own country, does not always come
without conflict.
We must also expect that nations will on occasion be in dispute with
up It may be because we are rich, or powerful, or because we
have made mistakes, or because they honestly fear our intentions. However,
no nation need ever fear that we desire their land, or to impose our will,
or to dictate their institutions.
But we will always oppose the effort of one nation to conquer another
nation.
We will do this because our own security is at stake.
But there is more to it than that. For our generation has a dream.
It is a very old dream. But we have the power and now we have the opportunity
to make it come true.
For centuries, nations have struggled among each other. But we dream
of a world where disputes are settled by law and reason.
And we will try to make it so.
For most of history men have hated and killed one another in battle.
But we dream of an end to war. And we will try to make it so.
For all existence most men have lived in poverty, threatened by hunger.
But we dream of a world where all are fed and charged with hope. And we
will help to make it so.
The ordinary men and women of North Vietnam and South Vietnam, of China
and India, of Russia and America, are brave people. They are filled with
the same proportions of hate and fear, of love and hope. Most of
them want the same things for themselves and their families. Most of them
do not want their sons ever to die in battle, or see the homes of others
destroyed....
Every night before I turn out the lights to sleep, I ask myself this
question
Have I done everything that I can do to unite this country? Have I
done everything I can to help unite the world, to try to bring peace and
hope to all the peoples of the world? Have I done enough?
Ask yourselves that question in your homes and in this hall tonight.
Have we done all we could? Have we done enough?
We may well be living in the time foretold many years ago when it was
said: "I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have
set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life,
that both thou and thy seed may live."
This generation of the world must choose: destroy or build, kill or
aid, hate or understand.
We can do all these things on a scale never dreamed of before.
We will choose life. And so doing we will prevail over the enemies
within man, and over the natural enemies of all mankind.