Opinion-Based Magazine Article
|
2 points |
4 points |
6 points |
|
|
|
Mind maps have minimal
information added. Students have not looked at
Some of the "bubbles" are left
|
Mind maps have adequate
information added. Students have looked at most of the web sites. Only one "bubble" is left empty. |
Mind maps are full of
additional information. Students have looked at all of the web sites. No "bubbles" are left empty. |
|
|
The questions are poorly
answered. Opinion is completely unclear
Some of the "note" boxes are
|
The questions are adequately
answered, but do not reflect deep thought. Opinion is vague and still in a developing stage.
Most of the "note" boxes are
|
The questions are fully
answered and reflect a clear understanding of the topic.
Opinion is clear and well
All of the "note" boxes are
|
|
|
Students have used bland
language There is no description and a
The writing is unorganized and
Sentences are wordy and
No evidence of proofreading
|
Students have used common language and there is a lack of enthusiasm in the writing Students have used very little
The writing is somewhat
Sentences are adequately
Some evidence of
|
Students use enthusiasm in their language Students use lots of
The writing is clearly
Sentences are direct and "to
There is clear evidence of
|
|
|
There is no title or catch phrase There is no colour
The picture is unrelated to the topic of the magazine article Students have forgotten to put their names and "National Geographic" on the page |
There is a title, but no catch phrase There is minimal colour and it does not cover the entire page The picture is still in a developing stage Students have remembered their names but forgot "National Geographic" |
There is a title and a catch phrase
There is lots of colour all over the entire page
The picture is relevant and reflects the topic of the magazine article Students remembered both their name and "National Geographic" |
Back to Main Page
Title Page