 |
SEEDS: A Criticial Framework for Implementing Educational Technologies
   
"The site that kind of grows on you." Ellis

What do we mean by "educational technology"?
SCOET defines educational technology as:
"Communications, media, computer or other electronic technologies
as the subject of educational programs, or as applied
in the delvelopment or delivery and administration of educational
programs, or as used by students to facilitate or enhance
their education."
Implicit in this definition is not just technology per se, but
also the systematic techniques for the development and implementation
of applications for educational purposes.

What's the allure of educational technology?
Technology is part of our culture. It creeps into every part of
our life, from the microwave that prepares food to the satellite
communications that bring us news from around the world. Just
as it enhances, automates and enables many tasks in work and play,
it offers promise to enhance many aspects of the teaching-learning
process, emancipating both teachers and learners from the tedium
of the routine and the tyranny of the status quo.

What are the barriers?
Differential rates of change: technology is evolving rapidly,
education evolves slowly. By the time educators can become aware
of a new product and technique, develop and evaluate applications
and spread the word for others, the technology has gone through
two or more generations.Building a community for the sharing
information helps overcome this barrier.
Costs: Unlike industrial training, education tends not
to pay directly for the costs of student time and lost productivity
of their time away from the workforce. Thus educational institutions
are unlikely to perceive a direct cost benefit from introducing
new technology. Acknowledging the true costs of what we do
now helps clarify the true benefits of doing things differently.
Resistance to change: Education is a human system. The
participants in the change process need to be convinced that there
is personal benefit to investing in change. Many educators are
survivors of more than one trend in educational technology. Learning
from their experiences, they try to involve themselves in those
changes which will have benefits in both the short and long terms.
While some may be caught up in the trend of the day, others avoid
investment in change which may not be supported in the long run,
or which appear threatening to their personal niche. Change
involves risk, therefore it demands support to reduce the technical
risk and reassurances to reduce the personal risk.
Lack of a critical framework: Innovation requires comparing
emerging technologies to guage their impact on the teaching learning
process and choose winning combinations of content, audience and
delivery strategy. A critical framework guides the decision
making by levelling the playing field.
|