|
This essay focuses mainly on the trade of street prostitution and on women, the people
who practice it most often (women prostitutes outnumber men in a ratio of four to one).
Despite the fact that prostitution is not illegal in Canada, activities closely related
to the profession are penalized (i.e. procuring, keeping a bawdy-house, communicating).
This results in the infamous "Catch 22" situation, where prostitutes face a good
news-bad news scenario: prostitution is legal, but it is illegal to practice it.
The government's and the legal system's inability to clearly define where prostitution
can take place facilitates the further victimization of women by forcing them to practice
their chosen profession on the street under less than optimal conditions. Moreover society
as a whole is partly responsible for young women choosing prostitution as a career. Also,
the incompetence of the law forces the police to be in a position were they have to make
the laws.
In the words of an authority on the subject, John Lowman, in Canada "the legality
of prostitution is rhetorical at best."
Arriving at a workable definition of what is prostitution is very difficult, since
not even the government can agree on what exactly constitutes the offence. Prostitution
is the exchange of sexual favours for money or other material goods, devoid of any
emotional involvement.
Although prostitution has never been illegal in Canada, many of the peripheral
activities intimately related with it are so penalized. Communicating for the purposes of
prostitution, soliciting, keeping a common bawdy house, procuring, and living off the
avails of prostitution are some examples of the type of activities that are criminalized
according to the legal system.
TOP
The purpose of the "procuring" and "living on the avails"
provisions in the Criminal Code is to hinder third parties from making a profit from the
prostitution of others. This includes directing potential customers to the services of a
prostitute, and living fully or partly off the earnings of a prostitute. In most large
cities, people in the service industry such as taxi drivers, bell-hops, bartenders, and
hotel clerks tend to supplement their incomes by procuring (Gomme, 1993: 301).
Pimps are people who actively seek out another person to prostitute for them. In
exchange for this, pimps are supposed to perform certain activities for their prostitute:
administer protection from the police, customers and other prostitutes; provide a
residence; and recruit customers for "their women" (Gomme, 1993: 301).
Although not a great number of women enter the profession as a result of manipulation
by pimps, several alleged to have been "managed" by a pimp at one point in their
careers. According to John Lowman very few prostitutes who have been pimped have anything
positive to say about the experience; other research, however, shows that some women
develop meaningful relationships with these men, (procurers are almost always men, except
in the case of madams; and hustlers or male prostitutes are rarely pimped). In some cases
the person who acts as a pimp is the prostitute's significant other (i.e. husband,
boyfriend, etc). This relationship is often characterized by the moral support, comfort
and assurance that is provided by the man.
Laws regarding procurers are just as ambiguous as are laws regarding prostitution in
general. According to what the law states, any person "who lives wholly or partly on
the avails of prostitution" is guilty of a summary conviction offence, which entails
a maximum penalty of six months in jail and/or a fine not exceeding $1000.
Problems arise as a result of the discrepancies between the way prostitutes and the law
define pimps. For a prostitute a pimp is someone who "turns out" another person
to work for him. This is another area where prostitutes are in conflict with the law;
these women are not allowed to have a significant other. A prostitute from Toronto voices
her frustration; "according to this law I'm not allowed to have a boyfriend because
any man who is habitually in my company is defined as a pimp. We want the procuring laws
removed. We [prostitutes] demand the right to have lovers" (Good Girls Bad Girls,
1987: 102; Lowman, 1992: 55-6). Noteworthy is that not many people are prosecuted under
this offence.
Soliciting
The solicitation law was enacted in 1972, and it was designed to deal with all the
aspects of prostitution that the Vagrancy C provision ignored. Section 195.1 read:
Every person who solicits any person in a public
place for the purpose of prostitution is guilty of an offence punishable on summary
conviction.
This section of the Criminal Code sought to punish an overt act, solicitation, but what
was meant by solicitation was not described. The solicitation law attempted to address the
issue of public nuisance that prostitution causes. Preceding the solicitation law, the
extent of what the police had to prove when prosecuting an individual, was that a
prostitute had offered her sexual services in a public place. After the controversial 1978
Hutt decision, however, to make a conviction the police had to prove that the prostitute
had been "pressing and persistent" when offering her services to a potential
client (CIR, 1994: 2-3; Lowman, 1992: 65). The flagrant failure of this law was due
predominantly to the encumbrance that it caused law enforcing agents. For this reason,
some will argue that prostitution spread unchecked across Canadian cities because if the
prostitute circumvented the necessary "persistence", she could ply her trade
uninterrupted.
Positive aspects of the soliciting law are, a) it expanded police power by permitting
the prosecution of male prostitutes and transvestites, b) police could no-longer make the
arrest of a recognized street prostitute merely because she did not appear to be busy
(Lowman, 1992: 65).
TOP
Communicating
The Communicating law was established in December 1985. Its principal purpose was to
reduce the visibility of prostitution, thus reducing the nuisance aspect of the trade.
Section 213 of the Criminal Code now read:
Every person who in a public place or in any
place open to public view (a) stops or attempts to stop any motor vehicle, (b) impedes the
free flow of pedestrians or vehicular traffic or ingress to or egress from premises
adjacent to that place, or (c) stops or attempts to stop any person or in any manner
communicate or attempts to communicate with any person for the purpose of engaging in
prostitution or of obtaining the services of a prostitute is guilty of an offence
punishable on summary conviction.
A "public place" includes any place to
which the public have right of access as of right or by invitation, express or implied,
and any motor vehicle located in a public place or in any place open to public view.
An important aspect of the communicating law is that for the first time in the history
of prostitution laws in Canada, the Criminal Code included customers "under the
purview of the law". Thus rendering johns vulnerable to prosecution.
Even though the latter has been an improvement in Canadian legislation with reference
to prostitution laws, section 213 has had little if any, positive effect on the trade or
the people who practiced it. Amid the negative aspects that have surfaced after the law
came into being is a dramatic increase in the murder rate among prostitutes throughout the
province of British Columbia. Furthermore, this law still does not indicate where
prostitution can take place legally (Lowman, 1997: 8; Duchesne, 1997:2).
Bawdy-Houses Offences
The laws regarding common bawdy-houses are aimed at those people who own or manage such
places. Since keeping a common bawdy-house is an indictable offence, the maximum penalty
for persons convicted on this count is two years in jail. Penalties for other people
involved, (i.e. customers and prostitutes) are not as severe; the other participants would
be guilty of summary offences. Section a 197 provides a definition of the terms
"place, " "prostitute," and "keeper" (Lowman, 1992: 64).
Since World War II, the places which have been involved in common bawdy-house offences
are the residences of the prostitutes, "trick pads" (a location used exclusively
for the servicing of a customer), and, most frequently, hotel rooms (Lowman, 1995: 338).
The police are not required to prove that the place is used frequently, the simple
"general reputation" is enough to demonstrate that acts of prostitution occur
regularly.
Places such as massage parlours escape being prosecuted under the bawdy-house laws
because the customer pays for a massage; anything that happens after that is agreed upon
between two consenting adults. Any payment that the masseuse receives is, theoretically,
without the knowledge of the proprietor and/or manager. Despite their sly modus
operandi, several massage parlours have been prosecuted to the full extent of the law
according to the this section of the Code (Lowman, 1992: 80).
TOP
When it comes to street prostitution the law is not only ambiguous, but it is also
overtly unfair. In Canada it is legal for a woman to sell her body, but it is not legal
for her to attempt to find any customers. Also prostitution is the only criminal offence
involving two consenting adults, where in most cases, only the female is arrested
("Anywhere But Here", 1992).
The definition of "place" in the bawdy-house laws, for instance, is so broad
that it is almost impossible to conceive a location where a prostitute could ply her trade
on a regular basis, without violating the law. As Russell indicates, this section of the
Code includes virtually any place:
If a parking lot frequented by four prostitutes
is a common bawdy-house, and a 5000 square-foot circus tent in which group sex took place
is also a common bawdy-house, then what place or establishment is beyond the scope of
(this) section (Lowman, 1992: 80)
If the government wishes to rid society of the nuisance created by prostitution, it
will have to either, define a place where prostitutes and their clients can meet and carry
out their agreement, or make prostitution illegal.
TOP
Canadian laws regarding prostitution were adopted from the British Criminal Code in it
the street trade was regarded as a vagrancy offence. This meant that people could be
arrested on the on the basis of their status (i.e. being on the street). Section 175(1)(c)
described a person vagrant when:
Being a common prostitute or nightwalker is found
in a public place and does not, when required, give a good account of herself .
The "Vag C" did serve its purpose of deterring street nuisance and
solicitation; unfortunately it had serious shortcomings. According to civil libertarians
this provision of the Code judged a person's status, rather than her/his behaviour.
Feminists were opposed to the vagrancy laws because they were doubly sexist. First, under
the law only women could be charged with prostitution. Second, there were no laws which
addressed the behaviour of the customers, (which were almost always men); thus they
remained immune to prosecution (CIR, 1994: 2; Lowman, 1992: 65; Lowman, 1995: 339).
In 15 July 1972 the soliciting law was enacted, marking the end of the "Vag
C". With the introduction of section 195.1, it became illegal to solicit another
person for the purposes of prostitution. The functioning life of this law was cut short by
the cornerstone decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Hutt; which
deemed that soliciting had to be "pressing and persistent" for the police to be
able to make an arrest. The new requirement rendered the law virtually unenforceable.
Two of the reasons attributed to the "failure" of the soliciting law are that
prostitutes are rarely persistent when they approach potential customers, and that police
in Vancouver actually gave up enforcing this section of the Code. Because of how this
section of the Code was worded, police in were put in a position where they had to decide
what part of it to enforce. For instance, in Vancouver, the escort services were not
disturbed because had they been prosecuted and consequently closed down, street
prostitution would increase. The increase of this part of the trade would create more
problems for the police from the citizen's groups.
As a direct result of police and resident lobby groups pressure on the government, Bill
C-49 was passed and on 28 December 1985 the communicating law came into effect. Under
section 213 of the Criminal Code it is not permitted to stop a motor vehicle, or impede
free flow of pedestrians to communicate with any person in any manner for the purposes of
prostitution. The principal goal of section 213 was to reduce the visibility of street
prostitution.
Critics of this law will say that it is absurd and unrealistic for the government to
attempt to "clean up" the streets when it does not offer a definition of a
location where prostitutes can practice their trade legally.
The evident failure of the law is due to the "one-sided" approach it took;
the communication law sided unilaterally with the residents without addressing
prostitute's concerns. When the government enacted section 213 it went against the very
thing that both the Fraser and the Badgley Committees agreed upon: to solve the problem of
nuisance to the public, the government must mediate between the two groups (residents and
prostitutes) so that both can achieve what they desire and need (Lowman, 1989: 208;
Lowman, 1995: 353-4).
The communicating law has been the last amendment made to the laws on adult
prostitution. It is clear that unless the government addresses the problem of street
prostitution taking into account the concerns of the prostitutes themselves, no law that
is enacted will have any deterring effect on the trade. Social problems cannot be solved
solely by laws.
One aspect of the issue of prostitution that is seldom touched upon is the johns.
Prostitution exists mainly because there have always been men who are willing to pay for
sex; and yet when the problem of the trade is addressed, rarely are the actions of the
customers taken into account. It was only until the communicating law that the government
included and penalized the behaviour of the clients in the Criminal Code. Ninety-three
years after the first Criminal Code, this is only counting from recorded history, the
Canadian government decides that the actions of the very cause of the problem should be
criminalized.
Although section 213 has been a legal disaster, it can be argued that with the
introduction of a law that criminalized the behaviour of the customers, some progress has
been made. However it is still very rare that men are arrested with charges relating to
prostitution.
TOP
MOST COMMON
CAUSES OF WOMEN ENTERING PROSTITUTION
Most street prostitutes have common backgrounds; they are women and men who come from
the lower socio-economic strata, and who are immensely dissatisfied with some aspects of
their home life (Lowman, 1992: 54).
Research on prostitution shows some basic patterns in the family backgrounds of people
who have entered the trade. The "typical" prostitute leaves home at a very early
age (67 percent of prostitutes enter the profession under the age of eighteen). All the
factors influencing this decision involve great dissatisfaction derived from the character
of interaction with members of the family, whether it is guardians or parents.
Relationships between guardians and would-be prostitutes are often characterized by
physical violence, and emotional and sexual abuse. For male prostitutes all the above
mentioned reasons apply, and in many cases there is the additional conflict that arises as
a result of the boys' sexual preferences. On some occasions, prior to their departure, the
youth has been living in a foster or group home.
The long years of abuse and neglect suffered at home serve to erode the young person's
self-esteem, rendering her vulnerable to making self-destructive decisions.
Initially, when a girl leaves home she does not intend to become a prostitute. Due to a
lack of a suitable trade or marketable skills that characterizes this age group,
prostitution becomes the only viable avenue to support herself. Since the minimum required
age for attaining social assistance is nineteen, this option is not available to young
runaways.
Furthering the young adult's predicament is her search for autonomy. Seeking autonomy
is one of the leading reasons that drives adolescents away from home, therefore,
requesting help from the state is not an option they will consider.
The theory that the majority of people involved in prostitution begin due to dire
economic need has been discredited. A study conducted shows that few women (8 percent)
entered the profession because of their economic situation; for the most part (57 percent)
it was a desire for luxuries and wealth that lured them in (Siegel, 1994: 405).
Early experiences with sexuality teaches young girls that their bodies are objects with
inherent value, which they can use to attain money, success or power (Siegel, 1994: 405).
Contributing to the attraction that the life poses on women, is that most types of
prostitutes are remunerated more than any other conventional employment. In addition to
this, women with limited education and skills cannot expect to have a well-paying job.
TOP
Although coercion is not a very common method of recruitment, it is often used by pimps
or madams as a way to keep the prostitutes working on the streets.
According to Lautt, who has conducted extensive research on the prairies, exploitation
is most frequent in the recruitment of girls between the ages of 12 to 16. Pimps scout for
young, naive-looking girls around bus depots, airports, train stations and other places of
access to the city. The pimp will follow an appropriate target until dusk, try to befriend
the girl, he may perhaps offer her a place to stay. Soon the young woman becomes
emotionally and economically dependent on her new "friend"; at this point the
teen is asked to prostitute herself. Should she refuse, threats of violence or violence
itself will be employed by the pimp (Gomme, 1993: 291).
A few women enter the profession because they are emotionally attached to someone, a
lover or a friend, who coerces them to take up the trade. In the report based on the
findings of the Fraser Committee, it was stated that in Vancouver between 50 to 60 percent
of prostitutes claimed they were introduced to the "the life" by other people
(Gomme, 1993: 294).
TOP
BIG SISTER RECRUITMENT
Close friends who are sexually active or professional prostitutes will influence
younger girls to enter "the life". Since sexually active young women tend to
search the company of peers with the same moral views towards sex, it is not overly
difficult to be convinced. Moreover those who are already accepting payment for sex
convince novices to "redefine the meaning of their sexual activities" (Gomme,
1993: 293).
The process of becoming a professional prostitute is completed when the criteria a
woman utilizes to screen her sexual partners is based entirely on monetary gain.
After a woman has spent several months as a prostitute, leaving the life behind will
not be easy. Finding a job after several months of being a prostitute is no easy task for
several reasons: while on the streets women do not gain any marketable skills, the
education they had before entering the trade is usually insufficient (no more than eighth
grade in some cases) and explaining several months of unemployment without any references
could be awkward. This lack of job training and of opportunities for alternate employment
is what keeps women who would like to retire, on the streets.
CONCLUSIONS
It is very interesting that in all the attempts that have been made to evaluate and
analyze prostitution not once has the government taken into account the point of view of
sex trade workers. For instance, neither the Fraser nor the Badgley committee included
among their panel a single sex trade representative.
If the government desires to put an end to the nuisance aspect of prostitution as
opposed to merely trying to control it, it should consider addressing some of the
fundamental problems concerning the people who practice the profession. For all involved,
it would be far more advantageous if the government stopped trying to legislate morality
and listened to the issues of the people who practice the trade as well as the concerns of
the citizens, and try to find a mid point between their differences.
Prostitution is one of the oldest professions in history; it is also unlikely that it
will be disappearing any time soon. The major cause for the existence of the trade is that
men have been socialized to view sex as a commodity that they can buy, and women as
objects whose sole purpose is to provide this sexual gratification. So long as there are
men who are willing to pay for sex there will be women willing to provide it.
TOP
REFERENCES
Anywhere But Here: Prostitution and the Law, (Video) Simon Fraser University,
1992.
Bell, Laurie. Good Girls Bad Girls: Feminists and Sex Trade Workers Face to
Face, Toronto: OPIRG, 1987.
Bullough, Vern and Bonnie Bullough, Women and Prostitution: A Social History,
Prometheus Books, 1987.
Canada. Department of Justice Canada, "Street Prostitution-Assessing the Impact of
the Law," 1989.
Canada. Library of Parliament, " Current Issue Review -Prostitution,"
February, 1982 (Revised October, 1994).
Davies, Nanette. Control of Deviance: a Critical Perspective, New York:
McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, 1990.
Gomme, Ian. The Shadow Line: Deviance and Crime in Canada
"Prostitution," Toronto: Harcourt Brace Javanovich, 1993.
Lowman, John. "Prostitution in Canada" in Margaret Jackson and Curt
Griffiths, Canadian Criminology: Perspectives on Crime and Criminality, Toronto:
Harcourt Brace & Company Canada, 1995, pp 333-359.
Lowman, John. "Sterling Prize Winner Challenges Prostitution Law" in Anne
Sharp (ed.) Simon Fraser Alumni Journal, Surrey: SFU Alumni Relations Office, 1997.
Lowman, John. "Street Prostitution" in Vincent Sacco, Deviance: Conformity
and Control in Canadian Society, Prentice-Hall, 1992, pp 49-83.
Province of British Columbia. "Community Consultation on Prostitution in British
Columbia," Overview of Results, March, 1996.
Siegel, Larry. Criminology: Theories, patterns, and typologies, St. Paul
MN: West Publishing Co, 1992.
Statistics Canada, "Street Prostitution in Canada," February, 1997.
TOP |