Terminal Weevils
General Biology of Terminal Weevils
Spruce Terminal
Weevil
Pine Terminal
Weevil
 | Differences
 | hosts & range |
 | feed up |
 | OW in leader |
 | attack height 2-5 m |
 | typical attack rate 5% |
 | hazard related to BEC (warmth) & density |
 | JS |
|

Source:
http://www.fs.fed.us/r1-r4/spf/fhp/field_guide/images/fig156.jpg
General Biology of
Terminal Weevils in BC
 |
Order: Coleoptera
 |
complete metamorphosis (compare
young vs. adult of terminal weevil vs. sap suckers) |
 |
chewing mouth parts (again,
compare to sap suckers)
|
|
 |
Adults feed on terminal leader - no
significant damage / larva feed under bark and are damaging
|
 |
Simplified life cycle
 |
adult feeds on leader (chomps a
hole in the bark) |
 |
female lays egg then 'deposits a
fecal cap' (polite way of saying ¢®^¶)
on the egg site (apparently they are not potty trained) |
 |
eggs hatch in a couple of weeks |
 |
larva feed on phloem of leader |
 |
pupate inside leader |
 |
adult emerges, feeds on twigs, OW
in duff, re-emerge in spring |
|
Spruce Terminal
Weevil (a.k.a. White Pine Terminal Weevil)
In natural stands this can be a
'rare' insect pest - small openings, shaded conditions, small leaders.
However, in the 1970's we established large plantations of S ... which meant
large food source in a warm area (more about heat sums later)
Hosts & Range
 |
In BC - Ss, Se, Sw (Sb, Pl) |
 |
Out east, (who cares ... well ...)
- pines (white, red, jack, scots) and spruce (white, red, norway, colorado,
black) |

Source:
http://www.pfc.forestry.ca/entomology/weevil/about_e.html
Note: not on Queen Charlotte Islands
Life Cycle
 |
Adults
 |
feed on leaders just below
terminal bud |
 |
lay eggs and cover with fecal cap
in late spring (May-June) |
 |
up to 100 eggs per leader |
 |
after laying eggs adults can
resume feeding (on terminals and laterals) and a life free of kids |
 |
adults can live up to 4 years
|
|
 |
Eggs hatch in ~ 2 weeks
|
 |
Larvae
 |
are stout, legless yellow-white
grubs, 0.6-1.2 cm |

"Tastes like
chicken"
 |
L1 feed independently, but later
they form a feeding ring and feed in summer months |
 |
this girdles the leader |
 |
larva feed downwards |
 |
kills 2 (3) years of growth
|
|
 |
Pupae
 |
are white and resemble the adult |
 |
they encase themselves in a "chip
cocoon" in the sapwood
|
|
 |
Adults
 |
emerge in late summer (rusty
brown / black) and are about 1 cm long |
 |
are teneral adults until
maturation feeding |
 |
OW in duff |
 |
in spring they walk or fly to new
host tree |
|
Life Cycle
Diagram from PFC
Life History from FPC Guidebook
Tree Response
 |
resin (more on this later) -
attempt to 'pitch out' the attack |
 |
lateral assumes dominance ... leads
to fork or crook
Roughly
40% - no damage
10% - minor scar
45% - minor fork / crook
5% - major fork / crook
Actual impact depends on site
productivity
good sites -
trees 'over grow' the defects more often
poor sites -
greater damage |
Population Dynamics

Source:
http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/tasb/legsregs/fpc/fpcguide/weevil/figure3.htm
 |
attack starts at about 5 years
(~1/2 m tall) |
 |
peaks at 15 - 30 years (2 - 10 m
tall)
 |
outbreak period ~ 15 years |
 |
fluctuates with
 |
weather |
 |
enemies (parasitoids &
predators) |

Source:
http://www.pfc.forestry.ca/entomology/weevil/mortality_e.html
The larvae of
the Lonchaea corticis fly (above) prey on the white pine weevil larvae
 |
competition for leaders |
|
 |
outbreak % higher on better sites
(bigger leaders) |
|
 |
then population declines
 |
slower growth on spruce (smaller
leaders)? |
 |
duff (OW site) more shaded? |
|
 |
most trees attacked within 5 m of
nearest attacked tree |
Signs & Symptoms
 |
leaders in spring - feeding
punctures with droplet of resin |
 |
leaders previously attacked
 |
red foliage |
 |
Sheppard's crook |
 |
top 2-3 years growth dead |
|
 |
older attack
 |
crease, fork, crook staghead |
|

Source:
http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/tasb/legsregs/fpc/fpcguide/weevil/figure4.htm
 |
inside leader
 |
spring/summer of current attack -
larva / pupa |
 |
older attack - exit holes, chip
cocoons |
|
 |
adult - rusty brown with cream
splotches |

Source:
http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/tasb/legsregs/fpc/fpcguide/weevil/table3.htm
Sheppard's Crook

Source:http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_8xC9bwq6AVU/SfGU0pArUYI/AAAAAAAAH9c/2hQ_vhh1axM/s400/wpw5.jpg
feeding larva

Source:
http://www.forestry.ubc.ca/fetch21/FRST308/lab4/pissodes_strobi/larvae2.jpg
Chip cocoons

Source:
http://www.fs.fed.us/r1-r4/spf/fhp/field_guide/largeimages/fig158-x.jpg
Exit Holes

Source:
http://www.fs.fed.us/r1-r4/spf/fhp/field_guide/images/fig155.jpg
Adult

Source:
http://www.forestryimages.org/images/192x128/1306048.jpg
Adult

Source:
http://www.forestryimages.org/images/192x128/1306048.jpg
Tree Resistance
 | repellants - (antixenosis) terpenes at high concentrations deter feeding
and oviposition |
 | juvenile hormone - (antibiosis) causes ovary atrophy (remain small and
undeveloped), female cannot lay eggs |
 | traumatic resin - (antibiosis) has mono-terpenes (makes the resin more fluid and better
able to 'soak' the egg site)
|
 | we are breeding for these traits |
Damage
 | deformity (= value) |
 | growth loss (= volume) |
 | avenue for decay (= volume) |
 | loss of preferred species (= value)
|
 | deformity ... remember |
Roughly
40% - no damage
10% - minor scar
45% - minor fork / crook
5% - major fork / crook
Actual impact depends on site
productivity
good sites -
trees 'over grow' the defects more often
poor sites -
greater damage
 |
growth loss (table of volume loss
related to attack % and attack duration) |
Attack % / Year |
10 Years |
20 Years |
30 Years |
40 Years |
10% / yr |
5% |
10% |
15% |
20% |
20% / yr |
15% |
20% |
25% |
30% |
30% / yr |
20% |
30% |
35% |
40% |
40% / yr |
20% |
30% |
35% |
40% |
ball park
figures: likely 15-25% volume loss, but could be in the range of 5 - 40%
Hazard Rating
 | 2 methods:
 | field observation & survey - = actual hazard - but some areas have
little recorded history "new watersheds" |
 | ecosystem (BEC = biogeoclimatic zones) - see Tree
Doctor |
 | theoretical method = HEAT SUM
 | coast - 888 degree days (above 7.2 celcius) |
 | interior - 785 degree days (above 7.2 celcius)
|
 | degree days = [ (max temp + min temp) / 2 ] - 7.2
 | calculate for each day and sum for year |
 | e.g. 18 max and 8 min ... 5.8 degree days
|
|
 | heat sum is related to latitude and elevation |
|
|
Management
 | Hazard Rating - Coast
 | none - (QCI) - no restrictions |
 | low - (north coast & north end of VI) - no restrictions |
 | medium - (outer west coast of VI) - < 20% Ss & ensure MSS met with other
species |
 | high - elsewhere - <10% Ss & ensure MSS met with other species
|
|
 | Brushing
 | brush = shade ... competition for conifers, but lower weevil attack |
 | Interior
 | short brush (willow) - no treat, as brush will do 'less damage' than
weevil |
 | tall brush (aspen) - B&W and live with weevil |
|
 | Coast
 | if Ss important for stocking then need to think (figures below are
'rough')
Age |
Low attack |
High Attack |
< 15 yr |
<10% attack - B&W likely OK |
>10% - delay B&W |
>15 yr |
<20% attack - B&W likely OK |
> 20% - delay B&W |
|
|
|
 | Spacing
 | dense stands are less affected by weevil (smaller leaders, more shaded
duff?) |
 | therefore delay spacing until after pop'n subsides
|
|
 | Prune?
 | done after JS |
 | seems to have no effect on infestation levels |
 | if you have lotsa $$$ then I guess you could ...
|
|
 | Rehabilitation - means cutting all the trees down and starting over ...
pretty drastic
 | only if meet these criteria:
 | need Ss to meet MSS (NSR without Ss) |
 | attack rate high (>30%) |
 | tree condition (from intense surveys):
 | for stems >5m - >50% with major defect - then consider rehab |
 | for stems <5m - most trees trees <2/3's ht of 'normal' Ss (e.g. severely
stunted) - consider rehab |
|
 | there are no other high resource value (e.g. wildlife, fisheries) that
would be impacted with treatment
|
|
|

 | Direct Control
 | leader clipping
 | 3x's per year for 5 consecutive years (adult lives up to 4 years) |
 | too labor intensive and $$$$ |
|
 | stem injected insecticides
 | can give 2 years protection |
 | under development |
|
 | resistant stock
 | under development |
 | remember
 | repellants - (antixenosis) terpenes at high concentrations deter
feeding and oviposition |
 | juvenile hormone - (antibiosis) cause ovary atrophy (remain small
and undeveloped), female cannot lay eggs |
 | traumatic resin - (antibiosis)
has monoterpenes (makes the resin more fluid and
better able to 'soak' the egg site |
|
|
|
Pine Terminal Weevil
Differences are highlighted
It is obvious that the pine terminal weevil is ... (what?)
|