Terminal Weevils
General Biology of Terminal Weevils
Spruce Terminal
Weevil
Pine Terminal
Weevil
| Differences
| hosts & range |
| feed up |
| OW in leader |
| attack height 2-5 m |
| typical attack rate 5% |
| hazard related to BEC (warmth) & density |
| JS |
|
Source:
http://www.fs.fed.us/r1-r4/spf/fhp/field_guide/images/fig156.jpg
General Biology of
Terminal Weevils in BC
|
Order: Coleoptera
|
complete metamorphosis (compare
young vs. adult of terminal weevil vs. sap suckers) |
|
chewing mouth parts (again,
compare to sap suckers)
|
|
|
Adults feed on terminal leader - no
significant damage / larva feed under bark and are damaging
|
|
Simplified life cycle
|
adult feeds on leader (chomps a
hole in the bark) |
|
female lays egg then 'deposits a
fecal cap' (polite way of saying ¢®^¶)
on the egg site (apparently they are not potty trained) |
|
eggs hatch in a couple of weeks |
|
larva feed on phloem of leader |
|
pupate inside leader |
|
adult emerges, feeds on twigs, OW
in duff, re-emerge in spring |
|
Spruce Terminal
Weevil (a.k.a. White Pine Terminal Weevil)
In natural stands this can be a
'rare' insect pest - small openings, shaded conditions, small leaders.
However, in the 1970's we established large plantations of S ... which meant
large food source in a warm area (more about heat sums later)
Hosts & Range
|
In BC - Ss, Se, Sw (Sb, Pl) |
|
Out east, (who cares ... well ...)
- pines (white, red, jack, scots) and spruce (white, red, norway, colorado,
black) |
Source:
http://www.pfc.forestry.ca/entomology/weevil/about_e.html
Note: not on Queen Charlotte Islands
Life Cycle
|
Adults
|
feed on leaders just below
terminal bud |
|
lay eggs and cover with fecal cap
in late spring (May-June) |
|
up to 100 eggs per leader |
|
after laying eggs adults can
resume feeding (on terminals and laterals) and a life free of kids |
|
adults can live up to 4 years
|
|
|
Eggs hatch in ~ 2 weeks
|
|
Larvae
|
are stout, legless yellow-white
grubs, 0.6-1.2 cm |
"Tastes like
chicken"
|
L1 feed independently, but later
they form a feeding ring and feed in summer months |
|
this girdles the leader |
|
larva feed downwards |
|
kills 2 (3) years of growth
|
|
|
Pupae
|
are white and resemble the adult |
|
they encase themselves in a "chip
cocoon" in the sapwood
|
|
|
Adults
|
emerge in late summer (rusty
brown / black) and are about 1 cm long |
|
are teneral adults until
maturation feeding |
|
OW in duff |
|
in spring they walk or fly to new
host tree |
|
Life Cycle
Diagram from PFC
Life History from FPC Guidebook
Tree Response
|
resin (more on this later) -
attempt to 'pitch out' the attack |
|
lateral assumes dominance ... leads
to fork or crook
Roughly
40% - no damage
10% - minor scar
45% - minor fork / crook
5% - major fork / crook
Actual impact depends on site
productivity
good sites -
trees 'over grow' the defects more often
poor sites -
greater damage |
Population Dynamics
Source:
http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/tasb/legsregs/fpc/fpcguide/weevil/figure3.htm
|
attack starts at about 5 years
(~1/2 m tall) |
|
peaks at 15 - 30 years (2 - 10 m
tall)
|
outbreak period ~ 15 years |
|
fluctuates with
|
weather |
|
enemies (parasitoids &
predators) |
Source:
http://www.pfc.forestry.ca/entomology/weevil/mortality_e.html
The larvae of
the Lonchaea corticis fly (above) prey on the white pine weevil larvae
|
competition for leaders |
|
|
outbreak % higher on better sites
(bigger leaders) |
|
|
then population declines
|
slower growth on spruce (smaller
leaders)? |
|
duff (OW site) more shaded? |
|
|
most trees attacked within 5 m of
nearest attacked tree |
Signs & Symptoms
|
leaders in spring - feeding
punctures with droplet of resin |
|
leaders previously attacked
|
red foliage |
|
Sheppard's crook |
|
top 2-3 years growth dead |
|
|
older attack
|
crease, fork, crook staghead |
|
Source:
http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/tasb/legsregs/fpc/fpcguide/weevil/figure4.htm
|
inside leader
|
spring/summer of current attack -
larva / pupa |
|
older attack - exit holes, chip
cocoons |
|
|
adult - rusty brown with cream
splotches |
Source:
http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/tasb/legsregs/fpc/fpcguide/weevil/table3.htm
Sheppard's Crook
Source:http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_8xC9bwq6AVU/SfGU0pArUYI/AAAAAAAAH9c/2hQ_vhh1axM/s400/wpw5.jpg
feeding larva
Source:
http://www.forestry.ubc.ca/fetch21/FRST308/lab4/pissodes_strobi/larvae2.jpg
Chip cocoons
Source:
http://www.fs.fed.us/r1-r4/spf/fhp/field_guide/largeimages/fig158-x.jpg
Exit Holes
Source:
http://www.fs.fed.us/r1-r4/spf/fhp/field_guide/images/fig155.jpg
Adult
Source:
http://www.forestryimages.org/images/192x128/1306048.jpg
Adult
Source:
http://www.forestryimages.org/images/192x128/1306048.jpg
Tree Resistance
| repellants - (antixenosis) terpenes at high concentrations deter feeding
and oviposition |
| juvenile hormone - (antibiosis) causes ovary atrophy (remain small and
undeveloped), female cannot lay eggs |
| traumatic resin - (antibiosis) has mono-terpenes (makes the resin more fluid and better
able to 'soak' the egg site)
|
| we are breeding for these traits |
Damage
| deformity (= value) |
| growth loss (= volume) |
| avenue for decay (= volume) |
| loss of preferred species (= value)
|
| deformity ... remember |
Roughly
40% - no damage
10% - minor scar
45% - minor fork / crook
5% - major fork / crook
Actual impact depends on site
productivity
good sites -
trees 'over grow' the defects more often
poor sites -
greater damage
|
growth loss (table of volume loss
related to attack % and attack duration) |
Attack % / Year |
10 Years |
20 Years |
30 Years |
40 Years |
10% / yr |
5% |
10% |
15% |
20% |
20% / yr |
15% |
20% |
25% |
30% |
30% / yr |
20% |
30% |
35% |
40% |
40% / yr |
20% |
30% |
35% |
40% |
ball park
figures: likely 15-25% volume loss, but could be in the range of 5 - 40%
Hazard Rating
| 2 methods:
| field observation & survey - = actual hazard - but some areas have
little recorded history "new watersheds" |
| ecosystem (BEC = biogeoclimatic zones) - see Tree
Doctor |
| theoretical method = HEAT SUM
| coast - 888 degree days (above 7.2 celcius) |
| interior - 785 degree days (above 7.2 celcius)
|
| degree days = [ (max temp + min temp) / 2 ] - 7.2
| calculate for each day and sum for year |
| e.g. 18 max and 8 min ... 5.8 degree days
|
|
| heat sum is related to latitude and elevation |
|
|
Management
| Hazard Rating - Coast
| none - (QCI) - no restrictions |
| low - (north coast & north end of VI) - no restrictions |
| medium - (outer west coast of VI) - < 20% Ss & ensure MSS met with other
species |
| high - elsewhere - <10% Ss & ensure MSS met with other species
|
|
| Brushing
| brush = shade ... competition for conifers, but lower weevil attack |
| Interior
| short brush (willow) - no treat, as brush will do 'less damage' than
weevil |
| tall brush (aspen) - B&W and live with weevil |
|
| Coast
| if Ss important for stocking then need to think (figures below are
'rough')
Age |
Low attack |
High Attack |
< 15 yr |
<10% attack - B&W likely OK |
>10% - delay B&W |
>15 yr |
<20% attack - B&W likely OK |
> 20% - delay B&W |
|
|
|
| Spacing
| dense stands are less affected by weevil (smaller leaders, more shaded
duff?) |
| therefore delay spacing until after pop'n subsides
|
|
| Prune?
| done after JS |
| seems to have no effect on infestation levels |
| if you have lotsa $$$ then I guess you could ...
|
|
| Rehabilitation - means cutting all the trees down and starting over ...
pretty drastic
| only if meet these criteria:
| need Ss to meet MSS (NSR without Ss) |
| attack rate high (>30%) |
| tree condition (from intense surveys):
| for stems >5m - >50% with major defect - then consider rehab |
| for stems <5m - most trees trees <2/3's ht of 'normal' Ss (e.g. severely
stunted) - consider rehab |
|
| there are no other high resource value (e.g. wildlife, fisheries) that
would be impacted with treatment
|
|
|
| Direct Control
| leader clipping
| 3x's per year for 5 consecutive years (adult lives up to 4 years) |
| too labor intensive and $$$$ |
|
| stem injected insecticides
| can give 2 years protection |
| under development |
|
| resistant stock
| under development |
| remember
| repellants - (antixenosis) terpenes at high concentrations deter
feeding and oviposition |
| juvenile hormone - (antibiosis) cause ovary atrophy (remain small
and undeveloped), female cannot lay eggs |
| traumatic resin - (antibiosis)
has monoterpenes (makes the resin more fluid and
better able to 'soak' the egg site |
|
|
|
Pine Terminal Weevil
Differences are highlighted
It is obvious that the pine terminal weevil is ... (what?)
|